Monday, February 16, 2026

Apollonius governor of Greater Syria poised as Quirinius of Luke’s Census

 



by

 Damien F. Mackey 

 

“His position as the Governor (Legate) of Syria at this time is confirmed

by the discovery of a tombstone in Beirut, known popularly as the

Q. Aemilius Secundus inscription. In it, Quirinius is called

the “legato Augusti Caesaris Syria”.”

Bryan Windle

  

Efforts to correlate the life of Herod ‘the Great’ with the Birth of Jesus Christ, and with the census – and there are many of them – are generally quite tortuous to read, and they tend to arrive at rather unhelpful conclusions.

Here is a part of one such example from the Christian Publishing House Blog:

Reconciling Herod's Death: A Debate Between 4 B.C.E. and 1 B.C.E. Through Biblical and Historical Lenses - Christian Publishing House Blog

 

Are the Conflicting Dates for Herod’s Death Irreconcilable?

 

Exploring the Dispute Over Herod’s Death

 

The timing of Herod the Great’s death has long been a source of discussion in biblical scholarship. Some assert that Herod died in 4B.C.E., while others maintain that 1B.C.E. best aligns with the biblical and historical data. This difference greatly affects how one understands the date of Jesus birth. There is confidence in the scriptural record that Jesus was born in 01 or 02B.C.E., an event that occurred near the end of Herods reign. Many rely heavily on the writings of the Jewish historian Josephus, while those who place greater emphasis on the biblical text look to Luke’s Gospel and related chronological references. The question is whether the data from Josephus, classical sources, and archaeological finds truly conflict with the biblical chronology. A closer look reveals ways to reconcile the debate without undermining the reliability of Scripture.

 

Why the Date of Herod’s Death Matters

 

The sequence of events recorded in the Gospels places the birth of Jesus before the death of Herod the Great. Matthew 2:1 mentions that “Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king.” Herod’s order to slaughter male children two years of age and under (Matthew 2:16) indicates that he was alive for a period following Jesus’ birth. If Herod died in 4B.C.E., some would argue that Jesus must have been born earlier. However, the biblical evidence places Jesus birth in 01 or 02B.C.E. Lukes references to the Roman census under Quirinius, a governor of Syria, reinforce that Jesus birth took place when Caesar Augustus had ordered a registration (Luke 2:1, 2). Reconciling these overlapping events hinges upon identifying the accurate date of Herod’s death. The entire timeline of Jesus’ early life, including the journey of his family to Egypt and their subsequent return, must align with the time at which Herod was still alive.

 

Josephus’ Accounts and Their Complexities

 

Josephus is often cited as a central figure in placing Herod’s death in 4B.C.E. He mentions that Herod died shortly after a lunar eclipse but before a Passover (Jewish Antiquities, XVII, 167, 213 [vi, 4; ix, 3]). An eclipse did occur in March of 4B.C.E. Many chronologists seize on this partial eclipse as the one referred to by Josephus. However, Josephus chronological data sometimes contain inconsistencies. For instance, Josephus dates the capture of Jerusalem by Herod as 37B.C.E. in one passage but also connects it to the earlier capture of Jerusalem by Pompey in 63B.C.E., creating a potential one-year discrepancy (Jewish Antiquities, XIV, 487, 488 [xvi, 4]). Josephus also employs Roman consular dating, which can be difficult to correlate exactly with regnal year counting. There is also the question of accession-year versus non-accession-year systems, in which one source might begin counting a kings reign as soon as he assumed power, whereas another source might start counting only after the next new year. Such details can create apparent chronological variations.

 

Josephus’ reliability is often considered high regarding first-century events he personally witnessed, but the data about Herod’s death occurred decades before Josephus was born (37C.E.). He relied on records, oral traditions, or earlier sources whose details might have varied.

 

There are also differences in how certain Roman rulers are listed. Josephus identifies Quintilius Varus as governor of Syria during and after Herods death. Some interpret these statements as conclusive proof that Quirinius was not governor at that time. Yet Josephus mentions scenarios where two officials in Syria served concurrently (Jewish Antiquities, XVI, 277, 280, 344 [ix, 1; x, 8]), indicating that Roman administrative structures could be more nuanced. ….

[End of quote]

 

The trouble is that, heretofore, we have not had the whole story.

 

A new base for yielding proper estimations

 

According to my revised view of the history of this time, greatly affecting early Luke, the Infancy of Jesus Christ occurred during the Hellenistic period when the wicked king Antiochus ‘Epiphanes’ determined to impose Greek-ness upon the Jews.

It was the desperate era of the Maccabean (Jewish) revolt).

 

This was one of the worst times for the Jews (Israelites) in the entire Bible.

 

Antiochus ‘Epiphanes’ was the Caesar, Augustus, who attempted to unify his kingdom, and who called for a census (Luke 2:1): “In those days Caesar Augustus issued a decree that a census should be taken of the entire Roman world”. Well, that is the usual translation, but Luke himself says nothing about “Roman” in the Greek original (γένετο δ ν τας μέραις κείναις ξλθεν δόγμα παρ Καίσαρος Αγούστου πογράφεσθαι πσαν τν οκουμένην).

 

This Caesar Augustus was, in fact, a Seleucid Greek:

 

Rome surprisingly minimal in Bible

 

(3) Rome surprisingly minimal in Bible

 

 

The “decree” of Augustus to his whole kingdom would correspond approximately (whether it be the same document, or not) with the far-ranging and vicious edict of Antiochus ‘Epiphanes’ addressed “to his whole kingdom” (I Maccabees 1:41-53):

 

Then the king wrote to his whole kingdom that all should be one people and that all should give up their particular customs. All the nations accepted the command of the king. Many even from Israel gladly adopted his religion; they sacrificed to idols and profaned the Sabbath. And the king sent letters by messengers to Jerusalem and the towns of Judah; he directed them to follow customs strange to the land, to forbid burnt offerings and sacrifices and drink offerings in the sanctuary, to profane Sabbaths and festivals, to defile the sanctuary and the holy ones, to build altars and sacred precincts and shrines for idols, to sacrifice pigs and other unclean animals, and to leave their sons uncircumcised. They were to make themselves abominable by everything unclean and profane so that they would forget the Law and change all the ordinances. He added, ‘And whoever does not obey the command of the king shall die’.

In such words he wrote to his whole kingdom. He appointed inspectors over all the people and commanded the towns of Judah to offer sacrifice, town by town. Many of the people, everyone who forsook the Law, joined them, and they did evil in the land; they drove Israel into hiding in every place of refuge they had.

 

Luke’s “those days” (2:1), the time of the census, were also, as the Evangelist informed us a bit earlier (1:5) - and as all would accept: “In the time of Herod king of Judea”.

 

King Herod, a close friend to Augustus, was, in my revised context, Philip the Phrygian, the second only to the king himself, and the ruler of Jerusalem (2 Maccabees 5:22): “However, [king Antiochus] left governors behind to oppress the people: at Jerusalem he left Philip, a Phrygian by birth and with a more barbarous nature than the one who appointed him”.

And, when the Seleucid king was dying (I Maccabees 6:14-16):

“Then he summoned Philip, one of his Friends, and put him in charge of his whole kingdom. He gave him his diadem, his robe, and his signet ring, so that he might guide the king’s son Antiochus and bring him up to be king. So King Antiochus died there in the one hundred and forty-ninth year.

 

This Philip, placed in charge of Jerusalem, was also King Herod, therefore, and he was, as well, the second right-hand man to Caesar Augustus, Marcus Agrippa:

 

Herod, the emperor’s signet right-hand man

 

(4) Herod, the emperor's signet right-hand man

 

In the standard history, now Herod, now Marcus Agrippa, will die before Augustus.

However, in my revised history, Augustus, as Antiochus ‘Epiphanes’, pre-deceased Herod/Marcus Agrippa – who, as said, was also the Philip who outlived his revered king, Antiochus.

 

A re-setting such as this proposed one will obviously impact considerably upon the Lucan scenario involving Caesar Augustus, King Herod, and the Birth of Jesus Christ.

 

It may perhaps even enable for a Maccabean identification of the elusive Quirinius.

 

And although this revised scenario may add another layer to the cake - the Maccabean era now collapsed into the Lucan scenario - it ought, in the long run, to provide a more pleasingly structured dessert. 

 

Indeed, the parallels start rolling in.

 

We have just read of the controlling edict to the kingdom issued by king Antiochus, by Caesar Augustus.

And of a wicked barbarian in charge of Jerusalem.

 

Now, further, I would suggest, as Joseph and Mary went, according to the census edict, to Joseph’s home town of Bethlehem (Luke 2:3-5), so, too, did the Maccabean family of Mattathias recently move from Jerusalem to their ancestral home of Modein (cf. I Maccabees 2:1; 13:25).

This important town has, unfortunately, been quite wrongly located:

 

Must look elsewhere for Maccabee town, Modein

 

(5) Must look elsewhere for Maccabee town, Modein

 

That this was no peaceful time for the kingdom of Judea is apparent from the legends about Judas the Galilean and his revolt at the time of king Herod and his son, Archelaus. See e.g.  my article:

 

Religious war raging in Judah during the Infancy of Jesus

 

(4) Religious war raging in Judah during the Infancy of Jesus

 

P. G. Cavalcanti has concluded somewhat similarly in his article:

 

Luke’s Census Solution: Judas the Galilean and Judas ben Hezekiah as a Single Seven-Year Revolt

 

(4) Luke's Census Solution: Judas the Galilean and Judas ben Hezekiah as a Single Seven-Year Revolt

 

though without his having recognised that the revolt of Judas the Galilean (and his colleague, Matthias) was the very same revolt as that of Judas Maccabeus (triggered by his father, Mattathias) - that the Maccabean age occurred, partially, during the Infancy of Jesus Christ.

Whereas the Maccabean family found itself right in the wrong place at the wrong time, the Holy Family had providentially escaped to Egypt for the worst of it.

 

They escaped King Herod’s Slaughter of the Innocents (Matthew 2:16-18), a murderous horror which was perfectly in keeping with the infanticidal régime of king Antiochus ‘Epiphanes’ (I Maccabees 1:59-61):

 

On the twenty-fifth day of the month they offered sacrifice on the altar that was on top of the altar of burnt offering. According to the decree, they put to death the women who had their children circumcised and their families and those who circumcised them, and they hung the infants from their mothers’ necks.

 

And Mattathias had lamented before his death (1 Maccabees 2:7-9):

 

‘Alas! Why was I born to see this,
    the ruin of my people, the ruin of the holy city?

The people sat idle there when it was given over to the enemy,
    the sanctuary given over to strangers.
Her Temple has become like a person without honor;

her glorious vessels have been carried into exile.
Her infants have been killed in her streets,
    her youths by the sword of the foe’.

 

All of a sudden our seemingly over-layered cake has begun to look far more tasty.

 

A tyrannical emperor, who has appointed a barbaric governor to Jerusalem, orders a controlling edict for his entire kingdom, and people must return to their ancestral homes for it. Babies are slaughtered, a revolt has erupted.

 

Also, in the books of Maccabees, as in the Infancy accounts of Luke and Matthew, there is abundant angelic activity at the time, as well as signs and portents in the heavens.

 

2 Maccabees 5:1-4:

 

About this time Antiochus made his second invasion of Egypt. And it happened that over all the city, for almost forty days, there appeared golden-clad horsemen charging through the air, in companies fully armed with lances and drawn swords— troops of horsemen drawn up, attacks and counterattacks made on this side and on that, brandishing of shields, massing of spears, hurling of missiles, the flash of golden trappings, and armor of all sorts. Therefore all men prayed that the apparition might prove to have been a good omen.

 

Furthermore – and this is most telling, and could be decisive – there is a revolutionary Judas in both the Maccabean and the Lucan (Acts) layers, and he, in the latter case, coincides with a census.

 

And he coincides in time with the Governor of Syria, Quirinius. 

 

Judas the Galilean

 

Apart from chronological factors and the Roman era location of Judas the Galilean, as opposed to Judas Maccabeus at the time of the (“earlier”) Greek Seleucid invasion – matters with which I have dealt above – Galilee would not be considered to have been from where the Maccabean family had originated.

 

Their ancestral home of Modein has today been fixed rather confidently - and it is quite far from Galilee (about 135 km) - at Modiin-Maccabim-Reut:

Modiin-Maccabim-Reut - Nefesh B'Nefesh

“Strategically located in the center of Israel between Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, Modi’in offers access to most of Israel quickly and conveniently”. 

 

 

This is demonstrably incorrect - see my “Must look elsewhere for Maccabee town, Modein” above. The Maccabean family could well have hailed from Galilee.

 

If the great Judas Maccabeus was the same as Judas the Galilean, which I believe, then Rabbi Gamaliel does him a great disservice in Acts 5:37: “…  Judas the Galilean appeared in the days of the census and led a band of people in revolt. He too was killed, and all his followers were scattered”.

 

That’s it!

 

This slight moved me to write:

 

Judas the Galilean: What was Gamaliel thinking?

 

(3) Judas the Galilean: What was Gamaliel thinking?

 

Quirinius Governor of Syria

 

We know that Luke’s Quirinius was a genuine historical character:

Quirinius: An Archaeological Biography – Bible Archaeology Report

“His position as the Governor (Legate) of Syria at this time is confirmed by the discovery of a tombstone in Beirut, known popularly as the Q. Aemilius Secundus inscription.  In it, Quirinius is called the “legato Augusti Caesaris Syriae.” …. So we know that Quirinius was the Governor (Legate) of Syria … and it would appear he oversaw a census in conjunction with taxing the population. …”.

 

And now it should be quite easy to find him in our ‘parallel universe’ of the Maccabees as the Governor of Syria right at the beginning of the revolt of Judas (the Galilean).

He is “Apollonius, the son of Menestheus and governor of Coelesyria and Phoenicia”.

 

For an early account of the apparently malicious Apollonius, before king Antiochus had turned fully rogue, we go firstly to 2 Maccabees 4:4-6:

 

Onias recognized that the rivalry was serious and that Apollonius, the son of Menestheus and governor of Coelesyria and Phoenicia, was intensifying the malice of Simon. So he betook himself to the king, not accusing his fellow citizens but having in view the welfare, both public and private, of all the people. For he saw that without the king’s attention public affairs could not again reach a peaceful settlement, and that Simon would not stop his folly.

 

Next, to vv. 21-22:

 

When Apollonius the son of Menestheus was sent to Egypt for the coronation of Philometor as king, Antiochus learned that Philometor had become hostile to his government, and he took measures for his own security. Therefore upon arriving at Joppa he proceeded to Jerusalem. He was welcomed magnificently by Jason and the city, and ushered in with a blaze of torches and with shouts. Then he marched into Phoenicia.

 

But Judas Maccabeus, early, would bring the career of this Apollonius (my Quirinius) to a shuddering halt (I Maccabees 3:10-12):

 

 Then Apollonius gathered together nations and a large force from Samaria to fight against Israel. When Judas learned of it, he went out to meet him, and he defeated and killed him. Many were wounded and fell, and the rest fled. Then they seized their spoils, and Judas took the sword of Apollonius and used it in battle the rest of his life.

 

 

No comments: